am too disappointed to make a decent review. We go for points. Spoiler warning, of course.
1. The first twenty minutes. Not bad. But even a bad start with Cate Blanchett, I collapsed in an avalanche scene after scene. I do not know ... I am not able to believe even for a moment in the role of the Russian bad guy ... caricature too. Too. And then
. The Ark. The case of the arc in the casino overall is smashed and then dumped there. If you had to make only a citation to the old trilogy, avoid potevan ^ ^ 'ie daaaai ... and no one has noticed, spandente and resplendent with divine light?
forgot: the nuclear test. I liked it, and many more. Too bad it is frankly inconceivable that Indy survives inside a refrigerator shot who knows how many miles per hour in the air and after hundreds of rolling, bouncing, etc ...
2. The central part. She also has moments that are saved, like Shia LaBeouf, which is certainly the best thing about the film. This boy will save us many filmoni_delusione, in my opinion. But then Spielberg puts me to make Tarzan in the jungle with the monkeys and I is not very well ... more (What a shame, I wanted to leave the cinema or ^^'), stand poised in an impossible between two jeeps in the race ... or, again, to launch a giant snake to save it to Indy from quicksand. Even here, though it was only to make the citations for comedians and remember the only phobia of Indiana Jones, Spielberg could call my fellow novice writers who surely would have found a better solution for a moment ...
3. Marmots in CGI. Sad. But really, really sad.
4. Karen Allen. Ma .. Why? Apart from that I just found forzatissima as a character ... fifty-one seems immature / dopata of antidepressants since the arrival of menopause ... but then ... had at least been nice to play ... ^ ^ 'Booooh. And when you run onto the jeep over the river? O__O a raving lunatic.
5. Some characters border on the absurd. So the other day I saw "The Book of Secrets" and I swear that we were very close as a level (the script of the movie he wrote a drunk ...). Fortunately the damage was limited to short are portions of dialogue.
6. Characterization, in general, very poor. My colleague / triplogiochista Mac, bah ... (Then finished in a way very very similar to Elsa in the third film, but enough with ste citations!). On Allen said, leave me alone Blanchett, John Hurt as for 90% of the film does not so stoned well as judges. Again, the only salvageable is Mutt / Shia. Oh, and Harrison ... boh. But yes. But I'm sorry, it was not enough at all to make this film an Indiana Jones movie. (In brackets: has done much - in negative - the Italian dubbing, in my opinion very bad, especially for Ford and Blanchett)
Aridatece Sallah, Brody and Dr. Jones Senior, _, (that I am at least been mentioned in photo ^ ^ 'here, also grew up Scotty I would have liked, as a return ... much better than this ...)
That is ... If I think of the historical characters ... those scenes ... ie, the epic quality of The Last Crusade ... exchanges of dialogue between father & son ... but also apparent bullshit become must for cinema as the scene where Sean Connery is the seagulls flew into the air with an umbrella to stop the enemy biplane of the third movie! (Imagine that my prof has projected during a lesson at school to show the fittings in masterfully done ...)
7. Chase & co. Another sore spot ... and thank goodness that the special effects dovevan be very few. Do not think I've ever seen fake action scenes and built ... that in the jungle, in particular, has really done what I did not fall. The only salvageable is a motorcycle, pretty much ... (Again, thank you, Shia)
8. The scene of formicheeee! I just say: inspiration live beetles mangiacarne Mummy? ^^;;;
9. THE SUBJECT. Weak. Here are just painful to note ... mid-film, I thought, but yes, there will be another. It can not be that simple. Maaya gods were aliens came to earth eons ago, c'avevano a big head, have donated their knowledge to the people ... no, come on, will be more complex. But. I mean, come to an end it seemed to have seen an episode of X-Files more than an adventure of Indy. What then ... have not explained a club O_O that aliens, like they were good? Bad? A pro who bother to speak with the mind of Indy doing almost crazy if you then Russian in the final scene we see the burn (?) by too much knowledge? I'm all casino to see only their megadiscovolante again? (And to show what I am good at ILM to collapse three mountains + Maaya many temples? What then ... the ILM has done sooo much better, in my opinion!)
10. Where is the intelligent humor of the old movies? Where's the rhythm, involvement, irony, dust and the whip? Where is the search for the pieces, recover the pieces, let them mate? In this chapter, everything seems to be already there, looking ready, just follow the mappina ... and then pperfavore, waterfall-shaped face is an idea I've seen in other three billion film (which, mmmiii, for sure in three thousand years has never noticed anyone!). Occhèi, Indy jokes about his age ... but then?
11. The finish. I have no words. Although the gust of wind and the hat and the passing of the torch ... mah ... mah. (Valar, however, thanks ^ ^ 'Harrison have given enough, I guess.)
12. I charge you, Spielberg. I charge you, Lucas. Do not devote yourself to more stories with aliens. PLEASE.
13. I think I've done. I cry. I'm sorry if I hurt someone left this post, I know there are many fans of Indy in my f-list who are also positively impressed by the movie, but ... Believe me, I am the first to be remained of shit.
. The Ark. The case of the arc in the casino overall is smashed and then dumped there. If you had to make only a citation to the old trilogy, avoid potevan ^ ^ 'ie daaaai ... and no one has noticed, spandente and resplendent with divine light?
forgot: the nuclear test. I liked it, and many more. Too bad it is frankly inconceivable that Indy survives inside a refrigerator shot who knows how many miles per hour in the air and after hundreds of rolling, bouncing, etc ...
2. The central part. She also has moments that are saved, like Shia LaBeouf, which is certainly the best thing about the film. This boy will save us many filmoni_delusione, in my opinion. But then Spielberg puts me to make Tarzan in the jungle with the monkeys and I is not very well ... more (What a shame, I wanted to leave the cinema or ^^'), stand poised in an impossible between two jeeps in the race ... or, again, to launch a giant snake to save it to Indy from quicksand. Even here, though it was only to make the citations for comedians and remember the only phobia of Indiana Jones, Spielberg could call my fellow novice writers who surely would have found a better solution for a moment ...
3. Marmots in CGI. Sad. But really, really sad.
4. Karen Allen. Ma .. Why? Apart from that I just found forzatissima as a character ... fifty-one seems immature / dopata of antidepressants since the arrival of menopause ... but then ... had at least been nice to play ... ^ ^ 'Booooh. And when you run onto the jeep over the river? O__O a raving lunatic.
5. Some characters border on the absurd. So the other day I saw "The Book of Secrets" and I swear that we were very close as a level (the script of the movie he wrote a drunk ...). Fortunately the damage was limited to short are portions of dialogue.
6. Characterization, in general, very poor. My colleague / triplogiochista Mac, bah ... (Then finished in a way very very similar to Elsa in the third film, but enough with ste citations!). On Allen said, leave me alone Blanchett, John Hurt as for 90% of the film does not so stoned well as judges. Again, the only salvageable is Mutt / Shia. Oh, and Harrison ... boh. But yes. But I'm sorry, it was not enough at all to make this film an Indiana Jones movie. (In brackets: has done much - in negative - the Italian dubbing, in my opinion very bad, especially for Ford and Blanchett)
Aridatece Sallah, Brody and Dr. Jones Senior, _, (that I am at least been mentioned in photo ^ ^ 'here, also grew up Scotty I would have liked, as a return ... much better than this ...)
That is ... If I think of the historical characters ... those scenes ... ie, the epic quality of The Last Crusade ... exchanges of dialogue between father & son ... but also apparent bullshit become must for cinema as the scene where Sean Connery is the seagulls flew into the air with an umbrella to stop the enemy biplane of the third movie! (Imagine that my prof has projected during a lesson at school to show the fittings in masterfully done ...)
7. Chase & co. Another sore spot ... and thank goodness that the special effects dovevan be very few. Do not think I've ever seen fake action scenes and built ... that in the jungle, in particular, has really done what I did not fall. The only salvageable is a motorcycle, pretty much ... (Again, thank you, Shia)
8. The scene of formicheeee! I just say: inspiration live beetles mangiacarne Mummy? ^^;;;
9. THE SUBJECT. Weak. Here are just painful to note ... mid-film, I thought, but yes, there will be another. It can not be that simple. Maaya gods were aliens came to earth eons ago, c'avevano a big head, have donated their knowledge to the people ... no, come on, will be more complex. But. I mean, come to an end it seemed to have seen an episode of X-Files more than an adventure of Indy. What then ... have not explained a club O_O that aliens, like they were good? Bad? A pro who bother to speak with the mind of Indy doing almost crazy if you then Russian in the final scene we see the burn (?) by too much knowledge? I'm all casino to see only their megadiscovolante again? (And to show what I am good at ILM to collapse three mountains + Maaya many temples? What then ... the ILM has done sooo much better, in my opinion!)
10. Where is the intelligent humor of the old movies? Where's the rhythm, involvement, irony, dust and the whip? Where is the search for the pieces, recover the pieces, let them mate? In this chapter, everything seems to be already there, looking ready, just follow the mappina ... and then pperfavore, waterfall-shaped face is an idea I've seen in other three billion film (which, mmmiii, for sure in three thousand years has never noticed anyone!). Occhèi, Indy jokes about his age ... but then?
11. The finish. I have no words. Although the gust of wind and the hat and the passing of the torch ... mah ... mah. (Valar, however, thanks ^ ^ 'Harrison have given enough, I guess.)
12. I charge you, Spielberg. I charge you, Lucas. Do not devote yourself to more stories with aliens. PLEASE.
13. I think I've done. I cry. I'm sorry if I hurt someone left this post, I know there are many fans of Indy in my f-list who are also positively impressed by the movie, but ... Believe me, I am the first to be remained of shit.
...
...
... quattromilavolte because JJ can do better with 40 minutes of Lost? Why do I have the distinct feeling that the finale of an hour and a half of the fourth season of Lost would do a terrible figure if it was screened at, thrilling audiences very, immensely more of the fourth episode of Indiana Jones, costing at least eight times as much and directed by a man called Steven Spielberg?
And with these disturbing questions, I go.
0 comments:
Post a Comment